19990317




Articles on 17th March, 1999.

Today's Articles: 36.


Articles' Numbers: (19990317_01-36)


Please press the following links to the articles immediately:

以下連結可直接看到每一篇主文章:

第1篇文 第2篇文 第3篇文 第4篇文 第5篇文 第6篇文 第7篇文 第8篇文 第9篇文 第10篇文

第11篇文 第12篇文 第13篇文 第14篇文 第15篇文 第16篇文 第17篇文 第18篇文 第19篇文 第20篇文

第21篇文 第22篇文 第23篇文 第24篇文 第25篇文 第26篇文 第27篇文 第28篇文 第29篇文 第30篇文

第31篇文 第32篇文 第33篇文 第34篇文 第35篇文 第36篇文






Article 1:

問車3N


S3M94 (matt4127@netteens.net) from 202.77.3.208 at Tue Mar 16 16:14, 1999 said:


上星期六有架3N(車牌DK1992)行9號,架車依家是不是已經退役?



Article 2:

Re: 87D有躉行啦!


東邪 (GK 9112) (mingyin@hkstar.com) from 208.167.252.197 at Tue Mar 16 21:06, 1999 said:


> 89X,上! (lmc03444@lmc.hkcampus.net) said:


>


> 今日放學,為左儲錢買模型,


> 又要行返屋企,行到去第一城


> 對出果個路口(近富豪花園果


> 個),見到部金躉,係都普躉


> o黎。初時以為係私車啦。點


> 知響我一看之下,原來係返


> 馬鞍山的87D。於是即刻望


> 下個車牌,係HZ 8186。


>


> 之後,返到屋企,話左呢件俾


> 阿媽聽。佢話佢都見過,仲見


> 到佢今朝行87X。咁樣睇,即


> 係87D有金躉做正車啦!


>


> 所以,想問下87D係幾時正式


> 有躉行?有幾多部行、邊幾部


> ?同埋有冇報站系統?


>


> 89X,上!





- 87D係o係今日開始有躉行的,為數一定唔只四至五部,但


唔係所有冷氣字軌都係躉,小弟今日所見87D躉如下(排名不分


先後):





ATR109 - HZ 8186


ATR111 - HZ 8389


ATR12? - JA 2???


ATR115 - JA 684


ATR100 - HZ 6722


ATR107 - HZ 7528





另外 ATR113 - HZ 7273 都係沙田廠的,唔知有冇板友今日見


到佢行87D?





東邪


GK 9112


Article 2: (Request 1)

> kin (pakkin@netteens.net) said:


> 87D 今日終於落躉啦!我今日(5:30 p.m )係站頭(錦英),見到兩部山寨躉泊左係度,有HZ 6722 (ATR 100) ,JA 684 (ATR 115) .今朝約7:10 a.m ,係錦英路斜路,錦龍巴士站,見到都普躉 HZ 7528 (ATR ??? )埋站.


> 我估計87D 總數有4-5部躉!





我今朝坐680返工經過沙廠對開,看見有三至四部亞記躉泊左響廠度,


估計不久將行87D,到時87D真係全躉啦!





今日都見到都普躉行87D既


--HM3044


Article 2: (Request 2)

> PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) said:


>


> 其實九記落躉o既路線會唔會同上年龍躉行九記線有關呢?


> 今日只係得3c, 5, 6, 9 同11 未用金躉. 呢幾條線會唔會遲d落金躉呢?


>


> PTC





好似呢幾條線有龍躉但有金躉


但冇龍躉行就有金躉蹯!


Article 2: (Request 3)

> kin (pakkin@netteens.net) said:


> 我估計87D總數有4-5部躉!


4,5郚躉是否全部代替大富豪? 如果係o甘, 又會有大富豪空出來.


之前K廠98D由躉代替的豪走晒去297, 現在297己經全部12米豪.


O甘87D冷馬呢? 己經留意到80X 換上更多12米豪, 但仲有11米車.


Article 2: (Request 4)

眼見的有都普同亞記(HZ 牌)





---


龍神丸



Article 3:

Re: 巴士公司有無想過宣傳 巴士的優點 呀???


N357 (clarina@vol.net) from 202.88.2.103 at Tue Mar 16 23:33, 1999 said:


> Stanley Yung (n281@hkstar.com) said:


> 地鐵給市民的感覺: 快.....


> 太子去旺角,搭地鐵都話快..??


> 幾年前,我同一位朋友鬥邊個快


> 由運動場道去銀行中心


> 佢搭地鐵,我行路


> 結果一齊到達


正如D人由觀塘入屯門成日都以為地龍加60M最快,實際上62X先係最快


>


> 地鐵又行上又行落,又要企,盲點又多,不過真係快,唔塞車


> 不過地鐵缺點差不多是巴士的優點


> 1.就腳


> 2.有位坐機會大


> 3.沿途多野昅(街外)(行青馬大橋好過搭地鐵)


>


> 其實,巴士營運成本往往比鐵路營運成本高


> 淨計人工支出都高得多


> (一架巴士載約100人--一位車長)(一列地鐵載約2500人--一位車長)


> 巴士票價應和地鐵差不多


>


> 紅公司: 搭巴士未必是溫馨,去探婆婆


> 巴士係有優點


係咪幾年前九記在報紙上刊登的廣告來的?


>


> 如果三間巴士公司可一齊或個別推廣一個方便/舒適的形象


> 應有助客量上升


好似九記,經常在「水果報」A疊刊登廣告,都係一件好事來的





N357 (ICQ#1004091)


九龍巴士相片站


Article 3: (Request 1)

Compare to MTR, which is the faster:


How about 42C and change 58M at Tai Wo Hau??


Article 3: (Request 2)

what is the likihood of traffic congestion between the


route of kwun tong and tsuen wan? people may always think


that taking buses are unreliable to carry them to destination on time.



Article 3: (Request 3)

I think the bus companies should promote more about the time


of the journey of certain routes, because for some routes


it is really faster than MTR!





Darren


BL35


Article 3: (Request 4)

Another advantage of MTR over bus is that, MTR provides


clearer routeing and station locations, that people are


more easy to understand. May be I should suggest bus


companies to state more information about the route on every bus stop &


inside the bus. Also, more efforts should be put on promoting


the next stop display and announcement system inside the bus.


This may give more confidence and certainty to passengers,


to help them know more about the route they are riding on.


Article 3: (Request 5)

曾經有個海報,是介紹地鐵加的士,就什麼地方也去到....


最後就不了了之.





除了地鐵外,小輪也是一個大的競爭對手.以過海為例.


愉景灣船務於1/4日接手尖沙咀-中環航線.


佢地計劃會把個碼頭搬住近郵政中心位置.


一個收$4-5(小輪),一個收$8.1,8,9,一個收12.


你話搭邊個?


Article 3: (Request 6)

One of the most significant advantages of MTR over bus is


'Certainty'. Even for some journey taking buses is faster


than by MTR, MTR still has its advantage that it provides


higher level of certainty to bring the passengers to their


destinations on time. While whether buses can reach the


destinations on time (or within schedule) depends highly


on external factors (e.g. road condition), it takes higher


risks than by MTR to be late unexpectedly.




Article 4:

Re: 都普躉裝不到報站機?


TL (awongtl@ihug.co.nz) from 203.109.252.5 at Tue Mar 16 17:35, 1999 said:


> 968 (jevonwu@netteens.net) said:


> 九巴1A的字軌表己經更新,各板友可以查閱


> 現在新加了都普躉ATR65&66,但沒有報站機。


> 請問現時都普躉是否裝不到報站機?點解?


>


> 如果將98D的亞記躉和這裡的都普躉調轉,


> 然後裝番報站機,有冇可能?





都普躉點會裝不到報站機呀? 城巴機場快線全部都有啦, 我估係未裝者.


Article 4: (Request 1)

> 968 (jevonwu@netteens.net) said:


> 請問現時都普躉是否裝不到報站機?點解?





點裝呀?


車頭有舊野, 有落車燈,遮不得.


報站顯示屏又大過舊野,更加不能裝.





我想解決辦法可像新巴般放個顯示屏於樓梯位後.


Article 4: (Request 2)

> 968 (jevonwu@netteens.net) said:


>


> but CTB's is different from KMB's !





問題應該唔會太大, 既然城巴裝得, 九巴都應該得.


Article 4: (Request 3)

> 野比大雄 (busstop@netvigator.com) said:


>


> 話不是這樣說。


>


> 照新巴3xxx同城巴22xx(2262及以後)既尾牌箱大小,係可以插膠牌,


> 點解九巴唔用呢撻地方而走去將個牌插上尾窗頂?





咁可能係新車有改善左呢,又或者照你咁講第日有批都普躉可能真係咁架喎,


好似新的OLYMPIAN同舊的牌箱位置變左同一原理,真係要裝報站系統應該只需


將個落車鐘移位就得, 不過可能個報站牌會阻住前面塊玻璃架.


Article 4: (Request 4)

其實都普車身不能安裝報站機的原因可能上層樓底比較低,恐怕安裝


之後,座在車頭的乘客起身時會碰及,


還記得Cityflyer的上層窗口位,一起身的時候!!!小心碰頭



Article 5:

Re: 城巴 'B' 廠?


Wan Chai Ferry (miketal@hkstar.com) from 202.82.16.162 at Tue Mar 16 16:32, 1999 said:


> T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) said:


> 今日見到架城記新躉車頭貼o左個「B」字(貼響行車証上面??!!)


> 請問城記邊間廠係「B」廠?


>


> .....


> T.P.T.


即係愛秩序灣廠代號


Article 5: (Request 1)

> PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) said:


>


> 咁請問同(E)廠有乜分別?


>


> PTC





咁請問同(s)廠有乜分別?


Article 5: (Request 2)

B- 前愛秩序灣代號


E- 現愛秩序灣、小西灣代號


S- 現南區廠代號


Article 5: (Request 3)

> T.P.T. (dckk@netteens.net) said:


>


> 愛秩序灣廠係「E」


愛秩序灣以前用'B',而家先用'E'



Article 6:

Re: GK9112係圓眼豪?!


TL (awongtl@ihug.co.nz) from 203.109.252.6 at Tue Mar 16 20:28, 1999 said:


> Jacky(S3M80) (jackyyng@hkschool.net) said:


> 如題。今日見到架車頭燈係圓的。


> 以前係己經咁,定係大修後轉的?!


>


> CP3827,再見......





之前已經係咁, 都好耐喇, 佢係唔係仲行40x?


Article 6: (Request 1)

> 東邪 (GK 9112) (mingyin@hkstar.com) said:


>


> - 係呀~我 (GK 9112) 係九巴三十部富豪熱狗之中唯一一部圓


> 眼豪,仲係40X 唯一o既荔廠字軌車,前幾日仲行過 48X 添.





不過‘你’在初出道的時候,其實都是‘方眼’的。


只不過後來被‘整容’吧了。^_^


(當年我曾經見過‘方眼’的‘你’在6號線出現。)


Article 6: (Request 2)

- 我 (GK 9112) 未掛40X之前,同我o既「死黨拍擋」S3V29 - GK 8843


兩個都係荔廠o既大後備,而我就曾經行過 6、6A、41A、44、44P、81C、


105、37、48X、49X、42A、102、69X 及 86C 等等,以前想捕我都幾難,不


過依家上左牌,好好多啦~





東邪


GK 9112


Article 6: (Request 3)

仲行緊40x,仲係一架掛牌車!



Article 7:

Re: Where is DL1?


2A_DL13暗西怪客 (ngamsai99@hutchcity.com) from 202.40.137.110 at Tue Mar 16 16:48, 1999 said:


> Ray (id00639@netvigator.com) said:


> Where is DL1?





可能係油塘,錦田之類的地方吧!


不過,DL1 Kam 慢(指行車速度,小弟寧願等多架巴士好過


(指其它DL---最好DL13吧)


____________________________________________________________


2A_DL13暗西怪客


ngamsai99@hutchcity.com


ICQ: 33546559


Article 7: (Request 1)

我以前聽過一位渣112(DL1字軌)o既前中巴卡佬講, 話DL1其實可以渣得好


快: 首先要慢慢踩油, 等佢慢慢轉波, 仲要用少少陰力, 如果大力踩個油門


架車反而唔識行. 佢一度渣住架DL1一度同我講: 「渣DL1要慢慢o黎架, 細


力踩油就勁向前標, 大力架車唔郁架! D車房佬見到架DL1都話驚呀, 呢架


車好難泊架. 其實好易渣咋嘛, 好似我之後o個個呀, 成日話架車唔識郁, 你


話係咪丫!」





覺得「中華之寶」(DL1)好正o既


James


Article 7: (Request 2)

> Citybus 5B (ronaldsamuel@ctimail.com) said:


> 2月尾 O係 小 西 灣





Until last Sunday, DL1 was still in Siu sai Wan.



Article 8:

Re: 有無人知到60M'話'加躉,而又胎死腹中的原因?


CV7946 (anthonycm@ctimail.com) from 203.80.83.203 at Wed Mar 17 00:12, 1999 said:


> S3BL428(FT9910) (pongka@chevalier.net) said:


> 早排有好多人估60M會加躉,


> 九記又真真正正用過躉來試線,


> 現在87D都經過試線之後加O左躉,


> 為何,60M就無份???


> 唔通荃灣地鐵站泊唔到12M???





我問過佢(1個女司機),佢話因為原本的躉要放去其他線(可能是87D),


所以60M要繼續用4DART(S)多幾個月.不過D司機已開發操11M車,用躉,


無DART日子不遠矣.(不過幾時真正用躉就唔知,SORRY!!!)





PS.60M其實唔用躉都得啦,好少機會用到接輪椅.


Article 8: (Request 1)

> S3BL428(FT9910) (pongka@chevalier.net) said:


> 為何,60M就無份???





D新金躉都俾晒沙廠, 邊道有躉來行60M. 可能遲D卦.


Article 8: (Request 2)

照計劃,四月會加躉,不過加下都3月啦,四月我諗唔得


2000年4月就得





60M點解話唔可以行12米呢,我成日見D12米富豪做完60X後做60M





在屯中打躉7年的金魚字



Article 9:

Re: 城巴點解咁無聊架? + 一問


肥B (pat22@netvigator.com) from 208.151.67.73 at Tue Mar 16 22:56, 1999 said:


> CMB太平紳士 (wong98@netvigator.com) said:


> 點解城記要將D 5xx 的頭枕除去,跟住又安o係D 6xx度呢?


> 城巴D野真係冇解!!


> 另外,有有人知邊D 5xx有頭枕,邊D 6xx有頭枕呀?





據我觀察所得, 5xx冇頭枕的有:513,515,516,519-522,524-529,531 & 538. 而6xx有頭枕的是:656-660,662,664,665,667,668,670,671,673-677.


如有錯誤, 請拍出, 謝謝!


Article 9: (Request 1)

> FP8167 (z0127629@netvigator.com) said:


>


> D有頭枕的6xx走曬去行962同969,我諗因為呢二條線係長途線,


> 同埋D車可以出4個number,早上便可出到962P,969P.


> 我只知675,679有頭枕.





AND THEN 664,667,669,672,674.



Article 10:

Re: Airport express Down again!


100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 208.139.121.176 at Wed Mar 17 09:23, 1999 said:


> Darren BL35 (ie_hsk@engsvr.ust.hk) said:


> The Airport Express is down again at 16:25.


> According to the news of CR and RTHK, there will be free bus


> service at Hong Kong Station, Kowloon Station and also Tsing


> Yi Station.


> But the charge is still $70!


> Can anyone kindly report the situation of the bus service?


> And also the will there be any effects on the aiport bus


> service?


>


> Thank you very much in advance!


>


> Darren BL35





First of all, I can't wait but feel happy and applause for


such incident, along with the platform incident in the morning.





Anyway, from what I saw on TV, MTR once again hired its buddy,


Kwoon Chung, for the emergency service. Buses being used


included Super High Floor Fuso with 'Asia' body, buses from


'Tai Fung', (Mercedes similar to NLB?) as well as ex-AH type


Hino of Argos.





100/911R/M1 Wong


Article 10: (Request 1)

> peggy (chihping@netvigator.com) said:


>


> I see a Toyota Coaster AEL Shuttle Bus in Tsing Yi, but there are no passenger,and it drive toward Tsuen Wan at Tsing Tsuen Bridage





按通告示是AEL4


地點(如冇錯): 青衣<-->機場





---


龍神丸



Article 11:

Re: 請問......


80M (wolfteam@netvigator.com) from 208.167.241.234 at Wed Mar 17 00:58, 1999 said:


> 肥B (pat22@netvigator.com) said:


> 唔知大家係咪經常入東涌呢?如果係,你o地坐巴士時有冇發覺小濠灣龍記廠內有一部躉泊在裡面,車頭冇Bumper,車頭一對門冇o左左邊,有勁多白色紙貼在車頭玻璃的.根據可靠消息人士透露: 此車是LW83 HT51x7,唔知大家知唔知此車發生什麼事呢?


可能是上年龍運躉誤入的士站的一輛


Article 11: (Request 1)

上年誤入的士站的是HT8xxx, 而且該車當時是撞橋底, 車頂嚴重損毀, 此車已維修好, 並且已經投入服務了(如果我冇記錯的話).所以, 我相信是另外一宗意外吧.



Article 12:

Re: [討論]三巴應否繼續狂出車


DA54 (da54@netteens.net) from 202.71.243.222 at Wed Mar 17 03:03, 1999 said:


> NWFB 1111 (lihoyin@ctimail.com) said:


> 各位唔知有無o念到大驗時會點?





係咪想話「狂出『新車』」呀?講清楚嘛, 以為話班次添.....





咁樣咪用「彈性驗車時間」囉,唔一定要到期才入廠!


Article 12: (Request 1)

Sorry, 唔係好明您意思!


___________________________________________________________________


2A_DL13暗西怪客


ngamsai99@hutchcity.com


ICQ Uin: 33546559



Article 13:

Re: DL45,DA85雙雙回到中巴懷抱


LF2 (BE 8749) (huil@genrad.com) from 132.223.232.71 at Tue Mar 16 22:05, 1999 said:


> MC1 (n7136579@netvigator.com) said:


> 繼DL45後,另一輛新巴面對一同命運.


> 它是早已上新巴車身色的DA85,在左面


> 的一角在新巴色中露出了藍色的底色,


> 及'China Motor Bus'的字樣.


>


> DA85昨日行8,今日行262.


>


> 相信今次事件不是巴士迷所為,而是


> 新巴的疏忽,希望新巴正視今次的事件.


> 以免令人誤會.


>


> MC1





Can anyone post the picture here? Thank you very much.





LF2 (BE 8749)


Article 13: (Request 1)

好明顯新巴開辦初期趕工髹第一批新巴色前中巴冷馬, 冇起舊油就


上, 幸好新巴在後來的翻髹車都先起舊油再用噴油, 效果好得多.


--


期望九巴將來都會在旗下車隊用噴油的


輝仔



Article 14:

Re: Don't know whether it is special or not


PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) from 202.40.139.35 at Tue Mar 16 20:01, 1999 said:


> Gakei! (Joseph_K.K._Lee_at_DTT.HONGKONG.HUB@deloitte.com.hk) said:


> This morning I saw a S3BL of Shatin Depot running on Rt.12,


> Was it very rare?







呢排係咪(s)廠多車得滯呢? 前o個排有板友話見到(s)鴨行70.


莫非(S)廠入O左批新龍仔?





PTC


Article 14: (Request 1)

- 以小弟愚見,果部 S3BL 應該係調左廠但未換貼紙,而沙田廠


呢排好似冇新小龍黎喎,o的新小龍多數都係九龍灣廠的,上星期日


就有三四部九龍灣新小龍行 96R.





東邪


GK 9112



Article 15:

Re: 11米行31M??


DR4102 (n170@netvigator.com) from 208.167.236.106 at Wed Mar 17 10:16, 1999 said:





> EK1037 (w0108@netvigator.com) said:


> 小弟在昨日晚上大約8:00PM 在石籬街市見到S3BL203行31M .車上有


> 客!! 乜11米行到31M的嗎?? 有冇板友可以証實???





當然可以啦,最多唔入梨貝街之嗎......





dr4102



Article 16:

Re: 新九龍綠小線: 70 鑽石山地鐵站 -- 大角咀(奧運站)


Gary&Carol (garycarol@ctimail.com) from 208.151.94.166 at Tue Mar 16 23:57, 1999 said:


> Eric & Rosanna (ericnet@hkstar.com) said:


> 一條九龍新綠小線 70 號線已投入服務, 來往鑽石山地鐵站至大角


> 咀(奧運站), 主要途經彩虹道, 太子道東, 太子道西/界限街, 大


> 角咀道.


>


> 服務時間: 0700-2230


> 全程收費: 六元


>


> Eric & Rosanna





下?? 新??


開左兩個禮拜都有喇喎... 勞生你無眼花嘛?


Article 16: (Request 1)

係一九九九年二月二十三日開的, 有開線傳單架(學埋九巴d衰野).


另該線申請緊將三元往大角咀分段延至新世紀, 要同12/21k爭生意





Jess



Article 17:

Re: 好心九巴唔好用d咁差o既報站機!!


Vigor (wkli8@se.cuhk.edu.hk) from 137.189.4.4 at Wed Mar 17 10:17, 1999 said:


> anthony lam (siufung2@netvigator.com) said:


> 我真係唔明, 九巴用果d報站機真係cheap到絕, 醜樣唔在講,


> 聲細, 音質差, 報站把聲又唔好聽, 有心攪點解唔攪好少少呢?


>


> '聲細, 音質差, 報站把聲又唔好聽' 足以影響成間巴士公司的形


> 象, 唔係講笑, 希望九巴檢討一下.





I think they should change the person made the recording,


speakers are not bad now (hope it's better of course)





I think the quality of the Citybus Hotline is very good, esp. English version,


and KMB had better learn from it.





Concerning the LED board, that on LRT is much better,


with closer dots, i.e. higher resolution, and English, Chinese characters


keeps switching from each other, but those on KMB only display English once,


then always show Chinese.





Also, those on KMB can't scroll, so, long words have to be truncated,


so bad!





KMB really had better learn from LRT & Citybus.


Article 17: (Request 1)

我覺得九巴個報站系統可以接受,不過真的太細聲,把聲好唔好聽


就見人見智,我覺得聽到又清楚就滿足了.





若果和廣東省各地的公車報站系統比較時,就會發現我們香港的巴士


乘客比他們幸福了,因為他們又是報站,但無顯示,把聲更細更差,


音質更差,所以我心想:會不會香港人被寵壞了,太幸福了,要求高?





F-stephen



Article 18:

Re: 104??!!


Jacky Tsang (lbjackyt@polyu.edu.hk) from 158.132.14.19 at Wed Mar 17 09:23, 1999 said:


> DA54 (da54@netteens.net) said:


> 據昨日(16/3)東×日報報導, 新巴表示前日起地鐵減價,新巴特別


> 去計算過海線的乘客量,並表示客量沒有下跌,反而部分路線


> 要加車行走!


>


> 同一篇報導表示, 新巴即將於下周起, 於路線


> 111, 112, 116 及 104


> 接受八達通繳費. (冇提 106 喎)


>


> 本人昨日亦見一部 112 字軌山寨躉的八達通已裝上液晶顯示屏,


> 相信可信性很高.





104 都有? 但成批字軋車都未裝八仔機喎


唔通可以一日裝晒, 又或者換左10xx果批躉做字軋?


Article 18: (Request 1)

Certainly, the editor wrongly replace the '6' with '4'.





'Direction' news often makes mistakes!





--


輝 仔



Article 19:

九巴金躉+龍仔+富豪車牌


金魚 (n960@netvigator.com) from 208.151.86.193 at Tue Mar 16 22:08, 1999 said:


各板友,狗等啦!!





新車牌:


ADS


191 JA 799 DDA2207/1718 U


192 JA1063 DDA2207/1703 K


193 JA1192 DDA2207/1717 K


194 JA1606 DDA2207/1709 K


195 JA2234 DDA2207/1708 K





ATR


115 JA684 SFD111BR1WGT10681 S


116 JA815 SFD111BR1WGT10689 S


117 JA1066 SFD111BR1WGT10669 S


118 JA1119 SFD111BR1WGT10692 S


119 JA1147 SFD111BR1WGT10683 S


120 JA1267 SFD111BR1WGT10691 S


121 JA1479 SFD111BR1WGT10690 S


122 JA2031 SFD111BR1WGT10688 S


123 JA2216 SFD111BR1WGT10682 S


124 JA2469 SFD111AR1WGT20342 S





DATE NEW:11/3/1999





下列龍運巴士由1999年3月起


轉為九巴車輛:


LW3->3AV346 HD2985 YV3YNA415VC027568


LW10->3AV347 HD4462 YV3YNA413VC027553


LW4->3AV348 HD3005 YV3YNA415VC028571





3AV344及345未有資料,見諒





敬希各位板友留意





九巴車牌資料中心


署理助理副打雜


金魚字


Article 19: (Request 1)

咁似做體橾? 1234 2234 ...... :p


今晚見佢行87D.


咁十部龍運豪全數俾哂九記? 由全富豪變全丹尼士, 有趣! 有趣!


謝謝!





--


輝仔



Article 20:

Re: 彌敦道上


968 (jevonwu@netteens.net) from 205.252.144.207 at Tue Mar 16 21:00, 1999 said:


> 德褔5D (97089033d@polyu.edu.hk) said:


> 小弟昨日出旺角, 又一次見到手提電話網絡商利用巴士站去宣傳商品,


> 今次係 '萬人' 電話, 以一隻兔仔拿著一個電話, 好似 '聖誕 JOY 滿九巴'


> 咁包住個站牌, 同埋好似機靈狗一樣掛在站柱上. 而在銀行中心的巴士


> 站上蓋, 更好似一個皇冠放在上蓋上, 加埋以風車掛在廣告牌側面.


>


>


> 5D 德褔花園 往 紅磡 (循環線)





雖然唔係好多人理佢,但都幾得意呀!


好過只得一支柱灰色咁悶...



Article 21:

Re: (討論)新巴應否舊車??新巴有乜o野錯??


TL (awongtl@ihug.co.nz) from 203.109.252.3 at Tue Mar 16 18:48, 1999 said:


> 經常喜愛偉大新巴之人 (hkwhenry@hutchcity.com) said:


> 本人認為新巴中巴的舊熱狗車,其實是無可厚非.因為政府,


> 市民等等,點解想要取消中巴的專營權.正是因為中巴的車齡過高.


>


> '或許對親中人仕來說,這並不是一個有力的原因.'


>


> 我想新巴上場後,舊車是為了改變市民認為新巴係中巴的想


> 法.如果新巴繼續使用中巴的舊車(指熱狗),哪麼服務質素又有何改


> 善呢?不如繼續由中巴做番.


> 中巴一向被人(大部份人)話佢冷馬少,所以新巴熱狗,留冷馬


> 是明智的做法.難道要新巴保留中巴的車隊,為中巴保留佢o既形象


> 咩!!


> 新巴是一間獨立的巴士公司,再者o的車隊已屬新巴所有,人o地


> 鍾意點決置就點決置,駛你教咩!!


> 其實新巴都是與城記對敵,與中巴的口徑一樣,大家親中的人仕,


> 為甚麼不轉投親新,總是要與新巴對著幹呢?


> 要記著中巴的滅亡,不是新巴的錯!!


>


> 請大家俾點意見,大家討論一o下.


>


> 請平心靜氣地回應,不要撞火!@@





為何你又再次post過篇文? 你知唔知咁樣可以作灌水論?



Article 22:

鴻X有陰謀嗎?


89X,上! (lmc03444@lmc.hkcampus.net) from 202.77.3.152 at Tue Mar 16 17:34, 1999 said:


唔知你地最近有冇去過鴻X(奸商鴻)


睇野,上過禮拜六我就去過先達果間


睇過,見到......


1.捷達Olympian模型--$19x


2.CityflyerA11香港版賣$380(相反金X都要四百幾)


3.九巴九七紀念版模型(紙盒版)賣$290


4.新記1001平成舊水,賣$550





以奸商鴻一貫作風,點都唔會減


價益街坊o掛!除左捷達Olympian


唔賣得外,其它的都幾受歡迎,點


解佢都會減價呢,唔通佢有陰謀?





89X,上!


Article 22: (Request 1)

你可想想,人家早排大手入貨,以為提高入貨量,可增加模型批發


商和巴士公司對其印象及地位,給果銷貨情況未見樂觀,為盡快吐


現,給果被迫割價傾銷,似乎是唯一出路,現在的香港巴士模型,


越出越多,根本炒不起價。





巴士文



Article 23:

87D A/C and hotdog buses ratio


100/911R/M1 Wong (wongjsy@sfsu.edu) from 208.139.121.176 at Wed Mar 17 09:08, 1999 said:


After seeing many ATR's on 87D these couple of days, it's about


time for me to have a trip to Kam Ying Court.





However, I'm not sure about the A/C and hotdog ratio of buses


on 87D. Is it as good as 1:1?





Thanks in advance for your reply.





100/911R/M1 Wong



Article 24:

問1A利蘭!


Dick (dvchan@netvigator.com) from 208.139.118.4 at Wed Mar 17 08:57, 1999 said:


想問1A係唔係有架AL24裝有報站系統呢?如果


係,又點解裝落架AL度,係唔係因為佢係字軌車呢?


其它1A冷馬(除Trident外)都有裝報站嗎?


另想問2061多行13號,定係M21呢?





見到D新巴DC都上


左國泰廣告係中環


出沒而以為A20既


DC4復活既


啊Dick



Article 25:

問各模型價格


東邪 (GK 9112) (mingyin@hkstar.com) from 208.167.252.197 at Tue Mar 16 21:23, 1999 said:


- 請問有冇地方賣模型係平過以下的?地點在哪?謝!





九巴 1A 躉 - $358


新巴富豪 (三部) - 各 $288


九巴兔年 - $245


九巴80M 富豪 - $ 245


九鐵 201 - $278


九巴 300 躉 - $288


城巴躉 2118 (冇字版 / 香港版) - $268





-請各版友提供資料,謝!





東邪


GK 9112



Article 26:

荃灣地鐵巴士總站消息一則


S3BL400 (sjs85230@sjs.hkcampus.net) from 205.252.144.90 at Tue Mar 16 19:07, 1999 said:


今日見到荃灣地鐵巴士總站D報站機終於開o左啦!


不過只係測試緊,但係估都快用得啦!





而且成個站D站柱上o左萬x電話廣告....做得不差...





PS:點解個機係寫'荃灣巴士總站'咁得意o既?





好鬼累仲有大把功課摧殘我


冇o左四分一條人命的


S3BL400


EK867


39A Buspage



Article 27:

新巴,我對你失望


DA74 (c3035083@hkstar.com) from 202.40.137.110 at Tue Mar 16 18:56, 1999 said:


今朝新巴14冇7:10LV特車,攪到D人需等好耐先能迫上車.








新巴,我對你失望!



Article 28:

N213 + 車尾問題一問


PTC (bc_cly@stu.ust.hk) from 202.40.139.33 at Tue Mar 16 17:06, 1999 said:


請問N213仲係咪行緊2D? 我想問:


有冇人有影N213 o既車頭相? (唔好諗me, 係完全只係影到正車頭o既相)


因為我想幫N213整攪牌相. 如果有, 請電郵聯絡.





另問點解有D九巴o係下層太平門隔籬個窗有一舊類似攝門膠o既物體?


我o係鑽石山木觀察過, 發現鴨一定冇, 但係就見到有D 3N有, 但有D


3N又冇, 點解?





三問: 請問城記幾時將180字頭Leyland退返俾北區? 宜家批車行乜線?





謝謝





PTC





PTC



Article 29:

【半山區消息】23B或會延長


叻霸佳 (letchan@netvigator.com) from 208.167.233.100 at Wed Mar 17 11:20, 1999 said:


據我一位住柏道的同學拿回學校比我睇的新巴寄來的問卷





新巴正在調查半山居民對23B延長的意見︰





寶馬山<->勵德<->銅鑼灣<->堅道<->蒲飛路





收費將和23看齊收$6.20





報導完畢



Article 30:

問:113今日有冇齋躉(11xx)行?


113 (miketal@hkstar.com) from 202.82.45.141 at Wed Mar 17 12:04, 1999 said:


請問113今日有冇躉行?



Article 31:

296D 加班


Y. F. Yiu (sjs84409@sjs.hkcampus.net) from 202.40.137.110 at Wed Mar 17 12:31, 1999 said:


報載 296D 由今日起加強服務, 平日 8-20 分鐘, 假日 10-20 分鐘


一班, 唔知加班後會唔會多o的人願意等 296D 呢?



Article 32:

Re: Where is the NWFB LV158


CMB DA82 (da82@netvigator.com) from 158.132.14.19 at Wed Mar 17 13:20, 1999 said:


> Philiphs (ykfong@vtech.net) said:


> 我很久無見到LV158行88號.


> 現在去了邊道?





上個星期至到琴日都係行722,攝18,


今日行23B (今日特別所見有~)





DA82,HB8095.



Article 33:

To : Tuen Mun Yan Oi Tong


59X (leungmlw@hk.super.net) from 192.193.195.25 at Wed Mar 17 13:57, 1999 said:


If i am taking 960 from central to TM and need


to go to TM YOT, which station i should get off?





(first or second or third after TM highway?)








59X



Article 34:

Where is LV1??


A MAN (winchan@edihk.com) from 202.84.130.246 at Wed Mar 17 15:49, 1999 said:





Where is LV1 today and the days after today?



Article 35:

英語一分鐘﹕城巴向中巴買二手車﹖﹗


Dennis Law (ctb2500@upnaway.com) from 202.61.238.1 at Wed Mar 17 15:42, 1999 said:


不知大家在英文版的城巴網頁裡面,有否見過這句句子呢﹖





Then in September we took over 11 routes and 120 buses worth of business


from China Motor Bus which consolidated our position as the second largest


bus operator in Hong Kong.





到底何解會有‘120 buses worth of business from China Motor Bus’呢﹖





最奇怪的是,中文版又沒有這個問題存在。真令人費解﹗



Article 36:

城記386已翻新


64K (miketal@hkstar.com) from 202.82.249.90 at Wed Mar 17 15:38, 1999 said:


內籠大至上同380一樣,但係車頭路線牌用返舊3格電子牌同


細字牌布,車側同車尾就用4格電子牌.





今日呢架車行5號